What “The Artist” Taught Us About The Importance of Silent Film.

"The Artist" This year's Golden Globes favorite.

If you needed a reminder of the importance of preserving film history, it was driven home by “The Artist’s” big wins during this weekend’s Academy Awards.

Writing in The Guardian, film critic Pamela Hutchinson says Michel Hazanavicius’ mostly silent tribute to Hollywood’s first golden age is a reminder that “film preservation doesn’t happen by itself.” When Hollywood switched to sound movies, 80 percent of silent films were lost, Hutchinson notes.

Here’s the nut graf:

“Film preservation doesn’t happen by itself; it takes care and technology and a good deal of money. Which is a lesson we’ve learned slowly, over the near 120-year history of the cinema. So, as a rule, studios no longer toss their movies aside the moment they leave the cinemas. There are national and local archives, and with home video, we’re all the keepers of our own private collections. By contrast, in Michel Hazanavicius’s silent film, Valentin burns his own work because he feels it is outdated, just as in that other Oscars big-hitter Hugo, George Méliès’s precious trick movies are melted down and made into shoes.”

Read the full story here.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Film News, Golden Age of Cinema, Hollywood and History, Silent Movies and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s